There are terrific answers here, but i thought id toss in my approach too. Rawls, the difference principle, and equality of opportunity rawlss second principle of justice requires that if some people in society have more wealth, income, andor power than others, then first, those goods are the rewards for social positions they occupy that are open to all under the terms of fair equality of. From the point of view of an entitlement theory, redistribution is a serious matter indeed, involving, as it. Utilitarianism versus rawls versus nozick 2479 words. A theory of justice as propounded and conceptualized by john rawls depends on two things. Nozick contends that this argument generalizes to any theory based on patterns or historical circumstances. Though rawls and nozick state their own ideas regarding justice, we cant help but notice the various similarities and differences within their arguments. John rawls ideas of a fair and just society are based on two main principles. These three principles set out nozick s entitlement theory of justice. Essay nozick s theory of justice in anarchy, state, and utopia 1974, robert nozick forwards entitlement theory of libertarianism that proposes 3 principles of distributive justice.
Theories of distributive justice unsw business school. Rawls theory of justice and nozicks anarchy, state, and. Utilitarianism versus rawls versus nozick 2479 words 10 pages utilitarianism is fine if your among the winners justice is better if you are not utilitarianism is the moral philosophy that the morally right action is that which leads to the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people. Nozick s anarchy, state, and utopia was largely written in response to rawls. As for rawl, his difference principle captures the idea of a fair distribution of the benefits and burdens of social cooperation. Nozick disagrees with rawls about the natural lottery. However, it is one that does benefit everyone, including the worst offif only a little bit. Entitlement theory of justice and endstate fairness in the allocation. According to rawls principles, choosing 6 over 5 would be just.
The two most significant philosophers on the principles of society structure are john rawls and robert nozick. Rather he has showered huge accolade on the former. The late harvard political philosophers john rawls 19212002 and robert nozick 19382002 are credited with reenergizing political theory in the contemporary era. Rawls s construction is incapable of yielding an entitlement or historical conception of distributive justice if historical entitlement principles are fundamental, then rawls s construction will yield approximations of them at best. Rawls on justice, rights and the state your account of the 1970s debate over economic justice, individual rights and the state robert l. Rawls, the difference principle, and equality of opportunity. The defence of liberal ideologies emerged not long after the second world war, prior to this there had been little faith in liberal values during the 1920s and 1930s, however after the war there appeared to be a renewed defence for liberal thinking ranging across a variety of ideological theories. Lecture 10 rawls and nozick john rawls a theory of justice.
The difference nozick is trying to articulate is that patterns will emerge within a. The entitlement theory of nozick entails that a person is entitled to a holding if he followed the principle of acquisition, transfer. As a harvard professor from 1938 to 2002, he strongly criticized the egalitarian political philosophy of his colleague john rawls which argued that it was right for the state to take wealth. Both marx and dewey reject attempts to settle the issue of the individual and society by reference to a fundamental social contract among independent individualsas occurs, for example, in the thought of hobbes and rousseau. As his is an endstate theory, where a positive outcome i. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate that the rawlsian state is justified and preferable to the minimal state as articulated by nozick. Nozick calls rawls distribution theory a patterned theory. A theory of justice is a 1971 work of political philosophy and ethics by the philosopher john rawls, in which the author addresses the problem of distributive justice the socially just distribution of goods in a society. He goes on to say how people own themselves and their labor and what their labor produces as. Nozick makes a distinction between timeslice or endstate and historical theories of justice. He also states that rawls difference principle is morally arbitrary in the notion of the rich wanting to help the poor. Rawls doesnt care about how people get their income nozick agrees with marx. Robert nozick applied entitlement theory in rejecting the concept of government.
It is unnecessary because a quite adequate theory of justice, namely, the entitlement theory, exists prior to the elaborate construction by which rawls moves from the original position to his two principles of justice. Nozicks objection to rawls difference principle is that it is a patterned principle. In fact, nozick acknowledges that rawls work is the benchmark of comparison for all other theories of social justice. John rawls and robert nozicks theory of justice in.
A theory of justice in distribution is historical when whether a distribution is just or not depends on how that distribution came. In his book, anarchy, state and utopia he argues that rawls views on liberty and the difference principle contradict each other corlett, p. Robert nozicks political philosophy stanford encyclopedia. Nozick s critique of rawls 175 are holdings that particular individuals are entitled to possess as a result of their actions in the creation of wealth and the exchange of goods and services see pp. Each person is to have an equal right to the most extensive basic liberty compatible with a similar liberty for others. The bottom line for nozick taxation of earnings from labor is on par with forced labor. According to rawls difference principle what society can be justified according to the difference principle. Robert nozicks entitlement theory of justice african. Robert nozick the entitlement theory of justice britannica. The difference principle is the second part of the second principle of john rawlss theory of justice. Nozick believed that no one had any business permitting economic inequalities at all. Nozick, anarchy, state, and utopia, pgsmasked if you have any trouble finding the location send a message as well, its a bit tricky your. Rawls, the difference principle, and equality of opportunity rawls s second principle of justice requires that if some people in society have more wealth, income, andor power than others, then first, those goods are the rewards for social positions they occupy that.
Robert nozick s libertarian, entitlement theory of distributive justice presents a radical departure from the more hypothetical ideas of john rawls. The difference principle permits diverging from strict equality so long as the inequalities in question would make the least advantaged in society materially better off than they would be under strict equality. Nozick thinks that when holdings have been acquired unjustly, we must appeal to a principle of recti. In this episode of beyond the lecture, aaron explained norzicks entitlement theory and rawl s theory of justice in the context of capitalism. Rawls theory of justice, nozick cautiously maintains, is a fountain of illuminating ideas, integrated together into a lovely whole. Remarkably, nozick never spells out the criteria of just acquisition. Rawls theory of justice principles of justice are arrived at using the original positionveil of ignorance thought experiment from this, two principles of justice emerge. According to this theory, every distribution of property that arose from voluntary, free transfers of justly acquired property is just. In a comparison with socialist thought by way of cohen, and liberal thought by way of nozick. John rawls alternative distributive principle, which he calls the difference principle, is examined next. Specifically, nozick takes issue with rawls conception of distributive justice as it pertains to economic inequalities. This would permit inequality wherever it could be shown that the inequality would improve overall welfare.
Robert nozick argues on behalf of an entitlement theory of justice. In arguing for it rawls rejected utilitarianism and its concept of expected average utility. To everyones benefit as when the possibility of earning greater rewards motivates individuals to work harder and contribute more to a socially useful enterprise rawls calls this the difference principle presumably because it is about when differences in income, wealth, and power are justified. From the point of view of an entitlement theory, redistribution is a serious matter indeed, involving, as it does, the violation of peoples rights. Is the entitlement theory an endstate theory, or an historical theory.
Robert nozick and his entitlement theory philosophy essay. John rawls, robert nozick, and the difference principle. There are however, several glaring flaws in rawls theory, many of which nozick leaps on. Distributive justice rawls and nozick flashcards quizlet. Robert nozicks entitlement theory of justice, libertarian. Rawls and nozick on fairness by john wilkerson two american philosophers capture important, competing perspectives in american society about the role of government and responsibilities of individuals. The first part of the second principle requires fair equality of opportunity. Rawls wrote that economic inequalities should only be permitted if they are to the benefit of society, and especially if they are to the benefit of its least advantaged members. The difference principle permits diverging from strict equality so long as the. Dont the less well endowed need the collaboration of the better endowed. The strong intuition that it is not unjust is accounted for by nozicks entitlement. Rawls theory of justice principles of justice are arrived at using the original positionveil of ignorance.
Rawls seminal work a theory of justice 1971 initiated a debate about liberal political theory that continues to this day. Nozick offered his entitlement theory argued that if people have rights and exercise them freely inequalities will occur as the natural. Nozicks anarchy, state, and utopia was largely written in response to rawls. A principle of distribution is patterned if it specifies that a dis tribution is to vary. Rawls difference principle allows for there to be inequality so. The theory is nozicks attempt to describe justice in holdings nozick 1974. The strong intuition that it is not unjust is accounted for by nozicks entitlement theory because chamberlain acquired his holdings by legitimate means but conflicts with the egalitarian theory. A large portion of robert nozick s anarchy, the state and utopia is dedicated to refuting the theories of john rawls.
Rawls argues that the state should have whatever powers are necessary to ensure that those citizens who are least welloff are as welloff as they can be though these powers must be consistent with a variety of basic. Distributive justice, position of john rawls,robert nozick. In this essay i will offer up a critique of rawls difference principle i will draw out the advantages and problems of rawls theory in relation to each end of the political spectrum. Essay summary of john rawls and nozick s entitlement theory. Robert nozick on john rawls theory of justice february 2, 2010 by gabriel hendin john rawls original position is a hypothetical situation in which rational parties make social decisions under a veil of ignorance, so as to prevent attributing advantages to one party over another. The entitlement theory is historical and nonpatterned.
Nozick s entitlement theory or rawls theory of distributive justice. In place of rawls s difference principle, nozick espouses an entitlement theory of justice, according to which individual holdings of various social and economic goods are justified only if they derive from just acquisitions or voluntary transfers. Like all patterned principles, nozick argues, the difference principle determines the nature of a just distribution of goods on the basis of unhistorical consid. Nov 27, 2014 rawls seminal work a theory of justice 1971 initiated a debate about liberal political theory that continues to this day. With regards to the difference principle, nozick argues that the rich may not wish to fully cooperate with the poor in redistributing wealth, for their natural endowments break no laws. Explain nozick s distinction between endstate principles and historical principles of justice. However, some may see this as a flaw in rawls proposal. While nozick s entitlement theory of justice has few literal adherents, many readers have been persuaded by his critical assessment of rawls s principle of distributive justice. Summary and analysis of john rawls and robert nozicks. In place of rawlss difference principle, nozick espouses an entitlement theory of justice, according to which individual holdings of various social and economic goods are justified only if they derive from just acquisitions or voluntary transfers. Introduction john rawls and robert nozick, two famous american philosophers standing at rival ends in the theory of distributive justice, have influenced the society not only in philosophy, but also covering economics, law, and public policy. Stickfigure john rawls and robert nozick discuss their conflicting views of liberty.
Distributive justice stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. One of rawls critics was a man named robert nozick, who in the early 1970s published a critical reply to rawls theory. From robert nozick s standpoint, rawls theory of justice is unnecessary. Rawls theory of justice isnt compatible with incentivebased arguments for inequality. Robert nozicks political philosophy stanford encyclopedia of. Explain the two ways of conceiving the problem of distributive justice that nozick distinguishes on p. A critique of rawls difference principle philosophy essay. Rawls arguments for his difference principle are far from convincing and have been much criticised.
It doesnt make any difference whether it is or will be somewhere. Robert nozick s claim that the principle is patterned constitutes the enduring legacy of anarchy, state and utopia. Robert nozick robert nozick the entitlement theory of justice. Rawls is actually committed to being more egalitarian than he thinks he is. Distribution, entitlement, and the assumptive world of a theory of justice chapter pdf available january 2011 with 8,428 reads how we measure reads. From entitlement theory of justice to inalienable rights. A large portion of robert nozicks anarchy, the state and utopia is dedicated to refuting the theories of john rawls. Oct 03, 2015 robert nozicks libertarian, entitlement theory of distributive justice presents a radical departure from the more hypothetical ideas of john rawls. Nozicks view is that the following inductive definition exhaustively. Nozicks entitlement theory comprises three main principles. Robert nozick in his famous book anarchy, state and utopia 1974 responded to, in part, john rawls distribution theory as articulated in the latters celebrated book a theory of justice 1971 with the formers entitlement theory.
Entitlement theory is not patterned and is a historical theory. Historical principles maybe patterned or not patterned. Jan 29, 20 stickfigure john rawls and robert nozick discuss their conflicting views of liberty. Rawls, theory of justice from what is justice pdf, psmasked 4. Nozick challenges the view that the difference principle represent fair.
This viewpoint is derived from rawlss theory of justice, one principle of which is. As nozick s anarchy state and utopia, in part, is a response to rawls a theory of justice, it is imperative to consider rawls theory first before moving on to nozick s. At t1, property is distributed according to d1, which accords with the just patterned principle p. Difference principle bibliography 1 the difference principle is the second part of the second principle of john rawls s theory of justice.
The moral duty to reject nozicks entitlement theory and advocate. Nozicks entitlement theory is not patterned, but historical. Central to rawls a theory of justice was the idea of justice as fairness which sets out substantively a version of democratic social justice. Nozicks view on theory of justice political science notes. Sep 23, 2012 for rawls the difference principle realizes a harmony of interests, in the sense that the better endowed acquires collaboration and the worse endowed receive certain compensation. For instance, nozick challenges rawlss theory by arguing that. The deep justification for the difference principle is that no one in a society can meaningfully be said to have earned the resources in his or her possession, including t. Comparison of john rawls and robert nozick politics essay. Nov 07, 2017 rawls difference principle is quite stringent. Rawls believes that nozick s entitlement theory, libertarianism and utilitarianism cannot be accepted behind the veil of ignorance. Rawls difference principle states that inequalities among humans are to be redistributed equally to. Any nonhistorical principle is an endstate principle and all are patterned.
Rawls, theory of justice pgs 5258 for two principles intro 3. Based on nozick s theory of entitlement, the new distribution is perfectly just because the. Nozick thinks the deep criticism of rawls s theory is that the veil of ignorance keeps entitlement from grounding principles of distributive justice. Rawls conclusion, the socalled difference principle, is that social. It says basically that you are entitled to your holdings as long as you acquired them through a voluntary exchange with someone else who, in turn, acquired them justly. Why does cooperative activity give rise to a problem of justice that we need rawls s theory to answer. Or, consider rawls s theory, which says according to nozick that a situation is just so long as it is one where the worst off are as well off as possible with no need to look at how this distribution is brought about. Nozick criticisms rawls for having an ahistorical theory. Nozick s entitlement theory of justice february 22, 2014.
Hence rawlsian justice is also called justice as fairness. The entitlement theory was created by robert nozick in his book anarchy, state and utopia, and talks about private property and distributive justice. A critique of robert nozicks entitlement theory florida atlantic. Nozick illustrates his belief that people are entitled only to those holdings that they have originally acquired in a just manner or that have been transferred to them in a just manner. A principle of justice in acquisition this principle deals with the initial acquisition of holdings. It is an account of how people first come to own unowned and natural world property, what types of things can be held, and so forth. Nozick may, in this way, offer as much of a foundation for adopting his natural rights stance as rawls offers in a theory of justice for adopting his contractarian stance. As a libertarian, nozick argues that the starting ethical principle to guide state action ought to be the nonviolation of. In place of rawls s difference principle, nozick propounds an entitlement theory of justice, according to which individual property holdings are justified only if they derive from just acquisitions or voluntary transfers. I argue that the areas of agreement between rawls and nozick are more significant than their disagreements. Public debates about the proper role of government with respect to health care, the economy. This is bracketing the concern about righting past injustices.
Compare rawls and nozick essay sample sample essays. An exception is those takings that fall under the principle of the rectification of injustices. This comes out in the first edition of the theory of justice where he points out that the books main aim is a systematic and workable moral conception to counter utilitarianism rawls. In the first place there is rawls liberty principle. What separates nozick from rawls at this very basic level is a difference in their construal of the implications of this common critique.
The needs principle is inherent in income support systems. These two principles make up his system of justice and incorporate welfare liberalism. This paper critically assesses the procedural accounts of political justice set forth by john rawls in a theory of justice 1971 and robert nozick in anarchy, state, and utopia 1974. John rawls argument for the difference principle 603.
Rawls difference principle allows for there to be inequality so long as it is to the greatest expected bene. The first principle requires that citizens enjoy equal basic liberties. The entitlement theory is, in nozick s terminology, unpatterned. One similarity between the two is that both men feel nozick s entitlement theory is insufficient to deny demands for a. Entitlement theory is a theory of distributive justice and private property created by robert nozick in chapters 7 and 8 of his book anarchy, state, and utopia. Robert nozick was a process based theorist friday, april 27, 12. Rawls argues in favour of a more extensive state where the government is obliged to provide. Lecture 10 rawls and nozick introduction to philosophy. In the light of his entitlement theory of justice, nozick was critical of john rawls difference principle. Though both rawls and nozick have developed two theories of justice it cannot be said that nozick was in any form critical of rawls.
100 562 595 828 799 915 1125 31 1176 290 406 27 548 833 338 492 797 1444 939 1330 1362 781 1453 1040 136 1467 980 146 1081 1036 1252 637 4 101 1009 1192 1121 1115 1148 52 1468 1116 463 1387 1179 1090 1363 947 1200 1001 655